शहर अमीरों के रहने और
क्रय-विक्रय का स्थान है। उसके बाहर की भूमि उनके मनोरंजन और विनोद की जगह है।
उसके मध्य भाग में उनके लड़कों की पाठशालाएँ और उनके मुकद़मेबाजी के अखाड़े होते
हैं, जहाँ न्याय के बहाने गरीबों
का गला घोंटा जाता है।
These are the opening the lines of
Novel “RANGBHOOMI” by Premchand written in 1924. The following case drama
proves that these lines are still relevant.
Giving its final hearing on 1993
Bombay Bomb blast case, the Supreme court sentenced Sanjay Dutt.
A.
5
years for illegal possession of a 9mm pistol and an AK-56 rifle brought from
Terrorist Abu Salem.
B.
Declare
Not a Terrorist.
As soon as the verdict was announced some people started a
movement to seek Pardon for Sanjay Dutt.
This drama is a perfect recipe for a
serious debate and I have some very important questions in my mind:
First, If the crime which Sanjay Dutt(A
well known actor, son of Rich/Actor/Politician) had commited, were done by a
boy Harry Khan(an unknown boy, son of a poor Indian Muslim), had the supreme
court still sentenced him for only 5 yrs and declared not a terrorist?
Forget the Judment. Would Indian
people have shown the same support for Harry Khan which they are now showing
for Sanjay Dutt?
Second, Is Supreme Court Judgment,
just a piece of paper, which Politician can use to wipe there ass? What is the
value of Supreme court Judgments if it were to be revoke by Politicians(Governer
or President). Why all this drama of Hearing and Investigation? And why the
Hell have we written on our National Emblem “सत्यमेव जयते”?
Third, What is the Indian Journalism
doing? Why are they not questioning the moral of People who are asking for Pardon
to Sanjay Dutt? Why are they not discussing the above mentioned points ? Some
section of media are even supporting Sanjay Dutt. What trend is media setting
by supporting a person declared criminal by highest court of India? Are we not sending
a message to our people that if you are rich and influential the rules of Law
do not apply to you?
My views are as follow:
Sanjay Dutt should be happy that he
has been declared “Not a Terrorist”, even after buying weapons from Terrorist. Also
the Quantum of punishment is too less for the crime which he had committed. If
a common boy I (Harry Khan) purchase weapon from Terrorist and caught by police,
I will be declared a terrorist by Media and common people even before court Judgment. (Yes I m questioning the viewpoint of Media
and common people based on religion). Well why would terrorist sell me weapon,
if they do not have good association with me? Do terrorist just give weapon to
anyone like me whom they do not know? (This is a point to ponder)
Those people who are seeking Pardon
for Sanjay Dutt have no Moral at all, especially, Some Lawyers, Politicians and
Members of Film Industry. They have shown their true color by supporting a
criminal. They are Traitor.
I believe Sanjay Dutt is likely to
get Pardon from Governor of Maharastra. Reason is very simple: Most Politicians
in India do not have Moral. Our Politicians are Bourgeoisie not Patriot.
One last thing:
The Law n Order, Judiciary, Government Machinery are all Just tools made by Higher class called Bourgeoisie, to control common people and serve needs of Bourgeoisie. The Law applies to us (common people), not to Bourgeoisie.
